For easy printing, download the Hydropower Issue Brief.
Hydropower accounts for a significant portion of the nation’s electricity supply, and is the most abundant source of renewable energy. Because the fuel (water) that turns the turbines to make electricity in a hydroelectric plant is essentially free, the cost of operating a hydropower facility is relatively low compared to other sources. There is a huge opportunity to develop additional hydropower resources throughout the nation, much of that at existing dams. There is also a wide and growing array of hydropower technologies and projects that have the potential to further increase this reliable, low-cost, non-emitting domestic source of energy. However, realizing the full potential of our nation’s hydropower assets cannot be done without modernizing the processes for licensing and relicensing projects.
Hydropower is the nation’s largest source of emissions-free, renewable electricity, accounting for 43 percent of domestic renewable generation and 6.4 percent of total electricity generation according to the most recent Energy Information Administration data from 2016. It is a reliable source of energy, being available most of the time, unlike some other renewable resources. Furthermore, hydroelectric generators can be started or stopped quickly, which makes them more responsive than most other energy sources for meeting demand for electricity at its “peak” or highest volume. These units also often have “black start” capability that makes them especially valuable in restoring power when there are widespread outages or disruptions on the system—this capability allows the generating units to cycle back on quickly if they have been tripped off in a power outage. Given these characteristics, hydropower plays a significant part in ensuring reliable, zero-emissions electric service at low-cost.
Most dams were built decades ago for purposes other than power generation, such as for flood control, crop irrigation, or storage of municipal water supplies. There is substantial potential for adding renewable electric generation to non-powered dams: only three percent of the country’s approximately 80,000 dams currently have facilities that generate electricity. Analysts at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory found that 12,600 megawatts (MW) of new, emissions-free hydropower can be generated at non-powered dams throughout the country. Also, there is potential to dramatically increase the hydropower output in existing municipal, industrial, and agricultural water distribution conduits/canals in the U.S. This untapped potential could significantly increase the more than 98,000 MW of hydropower capacity already operating in the U.S. The modernizing of existing hydroelectric generation equipment to increase its capacity is also one of the most near-term, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly means of developing additional hydropower.
Other forms of hydropower can also be developed or further developed in the U.S. as well, including pumped storage (currently the only significant, economically viable way to “store” electricity), hydrokinetic turbines, tidal, and wave technologies.
The Licensing Process
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the primary federal agency responsible for the licensing and relicensing of non-federal hydroelectric projects. In issuing a license, FERC is required under the Federal Power Act to give “equal consideration” to electric generation, fish and wildlife, water quality and supply, navigation and recreation impacts of a project. Resource agencies, such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, National Marine Fisheries Service, and others, play a significant role in the licensing process as well. These agencies can require “mandatory conditions” that must be met for the project to proceed, which FERC cannot reject regardless of cost, impact, or whether the condition is directly relevant to the project. In some cases, the economic impacts of these mandatory conditions have stopped the development of projects.
The current licensing process constitutes a significant impediment to the development of new hydropower facilities and the relicensing of existing facilities. This is especially true for small hydropower projects. While it is appropriate to consider the broad array of potential impacts of a hydropower project, FERC must be given more authority to weigh costs and benefits and to impose timelines for resource agencies to weigh in.
On November 8, 2017, the House of Representatives approved H.R. 3043, the Hydropower Modernization Act of 2017, by a vote of 257-166. Sponsored by Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), the bill is intended to modernize the hydropower licensing and relicensing process. H.R. 3043 is similar to language in previous bills and amendments offered by Rep. McMorris Rodgers in recent years, including in H.R. 8, the comprehensive energy bill that passed the House in the 114th Congress.
On June 29, 2017, Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee Chairman Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Ranking Member Maria Cantwell (D-WA) introduced S. 1460, the Energy & Natural Resources Act of 2017. This bill, which includes hydropower licensing reform provisions, is based on S. 2012, the Senate’s version of the comprehensive energy bill that died in conference at the end of the 114th Congress. S. 1460 was placed directly on the Senate “calendar” (rather than being referred to the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee) to allow for expedited floor consideration. The American Public Power Association (Association or APPA) strongly supported the hydropower licensing provisions in S. 2012 in the last Congress and now supports passage of S. 1460.
American Public Power Association Position
The Association strongly encourages Congress to pass legislation to cut the lengthy, duplicative, and at times, contradictory regulatory processes for relicensing existing hydropower projects. APPA supports requiring all resource agencies with mandatory conditions for a facility to work together under the designated schedule thereby reducing waste, improving decision-making, and reducing the potential for conflict. The Association also supports requiring resource agencies to clearly define the objective of each mandatory condition with an accompanying rationale and disclosure of impacts in an open and transparent manner, thereby adhering to the same standard of disclosure and explanation required of the licensee and other parties submitting mandatory conditions. Streamlining the multi-agency inefficiencies associated with hydropower development on federal projects is also necessary.
Finally, APPA continues to support legislation, programs, incentives, and initiatives that spur new hydropower development, including hydrokinetic, pumped storage, low-impact, constructed waterways, non-hydro dams, and the expansion of existing projects.