Supreme Court ruling seen as victory for hydro power operators
Originally published January 10, 2013
In a victory for hydro power operators, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the discharge of pollutants from an improved portion of a waterway into an unimproved portion of the same waterway does not require a permit under the Clean Water Act. In a Jan. 8 decision in Los Angeles Flood Control District v. NRDC Inc. and Santa Monica Baykeeper, the Supreme Court reversed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had held that the Los Angeles County Flood Control District violated its discharge permit by channeling polluted stormwater from concrete-lined to unlined portions of the Los Angeles and San Gabriel rivers.
APPA last year joined in an amicus brief in the case, arguing that the Ninth Circuit decision was inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent and could subject dam operators who do not add any pollutants from the outside world to the discharge permitting program.
Please Sign in to rate this.
Senior Vice President, Publishing
Jeanne Wickline LaBella
Editor, Public Power Daily
Manager, Integrated Media
David L. Blaylock
- To reduce impact of regulations, DOE should comply with process rules, Association says
- Judge backs New York on plan to support nuclear generation
- House bill designates municipal bonds as high-quality liquid asset
- California prices increasingly mimic ‘duck curve,’ EIA says
- Senate panel opposes sale of PMA assets, bolsters cybersecurity agreement
- Officials urge public power utilities to be prepared for cyberattacks
- Public power utilities recognized for high customer satisfaction
- Lawmakers hear about capacity market flaws, rising grid costs
- Hamilton Utilities’ urban forestry program boosts safety, reliability
- Cyber Hygiene: Preventive Care to Avoid Electric System Decay