Tony Clark: FERC should stay out of state regulatory proceedings
Originally published September 24, 2012
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission "should discourage parties from seeking FERC intervention in pending state proceedings in all but the most extraordinary circumstances," new Commissioner Tony Clark said in his first dissent. He dissented from a Sept. 20 order granting a request for a declaratory order finding that a proposal by Idaho Power, if approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, would be inconsistent with FERC rules on payments to qualifying facilities (e.g., renewable resources) under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act.
"By this order, the commission is allowing one party in a state proceeding to cherry-pick a single issue in a larger, ongoing case," Clark said. "By putting its thumb on the scale prior to the state commission even finishing its work, we could inhibit the parties’ willingness, or the Idaho commission’s ability, to come to a flexible, tailored accommodation that may meet the concerns of multiple parties—most important, Idaho consumers." While state regulators may not be able to resolve such disputes, "untimely FERC intervention can limit a state’s ability to do so," he said.
Please Sign in to rate this.
Senior Vice President, Publishing
Jeanne Wickline LaBella
Online & Magazine Editor
David L. Blaylock
- House hearing examines capacity market flaws, rising grid costs
- Hamilton Utilities’ urban forestry program boosts safety, reliability
- Kansas City BPU exceeds 45 percent renewable energy threshold
- Generators appeal judge’s ruling on Illinois nuclear support
- California lawmakers pass bill extending cap-and-trade program
- Eighteen individuals, ten utilities win national public power awards
- Officials urge public power utilities to be prepared for cyberattacks
- Public power utilities recognized for high customer satisfaction
- SMUD board approves new Time-of-Day standard residential rates
- Report sees more than seven million plug-in EVs in U.S. by 2025